Tuesday, April 26, 2011

4th Year of Jonas' Abduction


Please join us in a gathering tomorrow, 28 April, 3 pm at the Bantayog ng mga Bayani Grounds as we mark the 4th year of the Jonas Burgos' abduction. Allow us to thank you for your continued support and help us remind the government that we shall continue the search until my Jonas and other disappeared are returned to us.

EDITA BURGOS

Saturday, March 19, 2011

STATEMENT OF EDITA T. BURGOS, MOTHER OF MISSING ACTIVIST JONAS BURGOS ON THE CHR REPORT/RECOMMENDATION

After almost four years of waiting we see a glimmer of hope. The report of the Commission of Human Rights is now in the hands of the Supreme Court. Our theory has been right all along. The evidence gathered by the CHR confirms our family’s theory that the Philippine Army is involved in the abduction of my son and elements of the police and military are covering up to hide the identity of the abductors and those involved. We believe, however, that 1st Lt. Harry Baliaga will not act without orders from higher authorities.

We laud the brave investigators of the Commission led by Commissioner Jose Manuel Mamauag for their exhaustive investigation.

While we seem to have won this battle, the real measure of success is the recovery of my son. We shall continue the fight until Jonas is returned to us, alive and well and justice is served.

We pray that there will be more witnesses who will surface. We appeal to those who had a hand in the abduction and the continued detention of Jonas, to come clean and face the consequences of their actions. It is better to make right a wrong that has been done while one still has the capacity to do it.

We appeal to President Noynoy Aquino. You have always pronounced that the rule of law must prevail.- As Commander-in-Chief, it is time to show the military that you will never condone any wrongdoing. Mr. President, the military must be the first to follow the “tuwid na daan”. The military should be ordered to release the documents on the abduction of Jonas.

Please Mr. President, allow my son to return to his family.


March 20, 2011

Sunday, September 5, 2010

Tula ni Alex Remollino para sa mga desaparecido

Hindi Iyan ang Aming Hinahanap
Alexander Martin Remollino

Bakit iyan ang ibinigay ninyo sa amin?
Hindi iyan ang aming hinahanap.

Ang aming hinahanap
ay hindi ang inyong paboritong mga kanta --
mga kantang may mga titik nga ay walang sinasabi,
mga kantang may himig nga ay walang ipinaririnig --
mga kantang walang paiindakin
kundi yaong ang mga utak
ay nasa mga kuko sa kanilang mga paa.

Ang aming hinahanap
ay mga

kasama
kapatid
kaibigan

na iwinalang parang mga bula
at ngayo'y hindi namin malaman-laman
kung ipagtitirik na ba ng mga kandila
o aantaying isang araw ay biglang magpakita.
Sila'y mga taong
naglagay ng sariling mga buhay sa panganib
alang-alang sa pangarap
na lahat ay mabuhay nang walang panganib --
at sila'y iwinalang parang mga bula
ng mga duwag, mga natatakot
na matupad ang kanilang mga pangarap.

Ang aming hinahanap

ay kalayaan
at katarungan.

Ito ang aming hinahanap.
at hindi ang inyong paboritong mga kantang
walang paiindaking sinuman
kundi yaong ang mga utak
ay nasa mga kuko sa kanilang mga paa.

Huwag iyan ang ibigay ninyo sa amin.


(Reposting mula sa nag-fold na .com website ng FJBM. Si Alex Remollino ay masugid na advocate ng human rights at masigasig na miyembro ng FJBM. Siya ay namatay noong gabi nang Steyembre 3, 2010. Nakikiramay ang buong pamilya ng Burgos pati ang mga miyembro ng FJBM sa pamilya ni Alex. Salamat Alex!)

Friday, September 3, 2010

Burgos Family salutes FJBM supporter and family friend--Alex Remollino


The Burgos family extends their sincerest condolences to the family of ALEX REMOLLINO. He passed on this evening at the Philippine General Hospital. Alex was a fervent advocate of Human Rights and a true supporter of the Free Jonas Burgos Movement. He helped tremendously in the writing department and always offered his hands to assist us to the best of his abilities. We thank him for his love and we will remember him as a true friend of the Burgos Family. Alex was a journalist and served Bulatlat.com. He was also a writer and poet.

Alex signing a copy of the book 'ipuipo sa piging'. Photo taken during the launch of the anthology of poems. Alex was a contributor. (Aug. 23, 2010)

Wednesday, June 23, 2010

FJBM reaction to the SC ruling

This is an atrocity against our family and against our people’s right to seek swift justice.

After three years of my son’s disappearance, and after a previous Supreme Court decision on July 16, 2007 granting our petition for habeas corpus, the same Supreme Court, in classic Pontius Pilate style, has now passed the case back on to the Commission on Human Rights for a “more meaningful investigation.”

We are, therefore, back to square one more than three years after the military and the police abducted my son. This, in spite of a writ of amparo we were granted by the appellate court in December 2007.

This is blatantly a whitewash disguised as judicial hogwash. The writ of amparo, much-trumpeted by the Supreme Court, has become merely a tool of the courts to further obfuscate and muddle the issue.

Citing “significant lapses” in the official investigation conducted by the PNP and AFP . Justice delayed is justice denied. But the Supreme Court seems not to be on the side of truth and justice but wallows in indecision and official deniability.

Despite the slow pace in the case, my family continued to respect the process even if we already felt that there was a cover-up in the abduction of my son by no less than our Iaw enforcers.

Now, do we have to pray again for the CHR to live up to this challenge of another investigation? But we have a CHR chair who is about to leave her post to assume a Cabinet position. Do we appeal to her to “please finish your investigation before you take on another sensitive post in government” this time?

I have consulted my lawyer Atty. Ricardo Fernandez, and he too was surprised that with the voluminous documents that were forwarded to the courts, the SC will now say that the Armed Forces of the Philippine and the Philippine National Police should make available to CHR pertinent documents and records. He wonders why the high court is again ordering a full probe of the case by the Commission on Human Rights when Jonas’s case had supposedly been previously investigated by the police, the military, the Justice Department and even the CHR.

Obviously the Supreme Court is washing its hands over the alleged cover up of the investigation. It did not even give a hint on whether or not the military officers and personnel that we have linked to the disappearance are guilty or not.

In the meantime, we are forced to continue searching for my missing son.

I believe that he is still alive, and his military captors must surface him. If he is dead, they must show me his body, and justice must prevail.

Edita Burgos' letter to the Supreme Court

June 23, 2010

The SUPREME COURT

Your Honors:

On the eve of the feast of St. John the Baptist, whose head literally rolled because he was a man of truth and stood in witness of it. I feel that the same thing that happened to the prophet, St. John, is happening to me. I write to you since I feel that this is only option I have for the High Court to listen again to my plea. Please bear with this mother who, in her desperate search for her son, has questions that you alone can answer.

I have read from the news reports that you have finally decided on our Petition, re: the Jonas Case. I cannot understand how your honors arrived at this decision and so I beg you to answer this mother’s questions.

We have prayed and waited for almost two years, and all we got was an instruction from our revered magistrates for the Commission on Human Rights to investigate the case extensively. Did it have to take so long for the Supreme Court to find out that the investigators made serious lapses? We were required by the Court of Appeals to submit our response in five days after it penned its resolution which we did but the Supreme Court took five weeks short of 2 years simply to say that it cannot rule on the case because there were lapses in the investigation?

We have been hoping that cases concerning petitions of the Writ of Amparo would be dealt with expeditiously by the courts considering the urgency of the matter. But today I can say with certainty that this is not so. It is a useless exercise. Do we really have to really add another 90 days for a case that you have been handling for almost two years? How can the eroded trust be restored? The better question is why should I even attempt to have this trust restored?

That the lapses were, in fact, efforts to cover up the identity of the perpetrators was what we consistently pointed out throughout the hearings. Now the Supreme Court agrees, yet why are the respondents not cited for contempt? Or instead, why was the commander-in-chief’s name dropped from the list of respondents?

We started our search for Jonas by seeking the help of the CHR where the investigation was unceremoniously closed when I was even unjustly accused of being ‘uncooperative’. We then sought the help of the Philippine National Police and then the Armed Forces of the Philippines . But we were just given a run around. And so we brought our case to the Department of Justice. And now you are asking us to go back to the CHR . Will this be a new start of going around in circles again? If the serious lapses were committed by the police, why are they not punished instead of passing on the burden to us, the victims, and to the CHR whose mandate to investigate is limited?

At the hearings names several cropped up. Names of people who could shed light in the abduction of Jonas and who can tell us where Jonas is.

Why has the DOJ not asked the CHR to investigate the case of 1st Lt. Dick Abletes, who may be undergoing court martial now, to shed light on the abduction of my son?

Why has the SC not asked that Col. Melquiades Feliciano, then commander of the 56th IB, be investigated thoroughly to find out if he was the one who implemented the order to abduct Jonas? And how about the intelligence officer of the 56th IB, Lt. Jaime Mendaros the author of the Order of Battle where Jonas’ name appeared?

Or why has the SC been silent on the participation of Gen Romeo Tolentino, then as chief of Army, in the abduction? Was he not the one who ordered the abduction of Jonas? And why has the SC not cited Romeo for contempt for lying in court?

Could the SC not just ask Col. Joel Napoleon Coronel, who at that time was the Chief Superintendent of the CIDG- PNP that started the investigation, on the results of his investigation? Or since the order to investigate thoroughly was given by the CA to the PNP and the AFP in its resolution last July, 2008 should not they be cited for contempt by the court for not following this order? For the failure of the police to do their job, why are we being punished?

Instead of rejoicing that the high court has finally acted on our case, I can only express my disappointment. It is very sad, indeed. Instead of ruling on our petition, the Supreme Court just passed on the burden to another institution . . . prolonging our agony, diminishing our chances of finding Jonas, and to make matters worse, putting the blame on us. Why is this so your honors?

The smallest ray of hope to find my son Jonas, pinned on the highest court of the land, but it has just been shattered. I hope that this is not an omen of things to come for all other cases of human rights violations.

Our search for the truth on what happened to Jonas will not end. We believe in a higher Court where justice will be obtained. It is this belief in the One Judge that strengthens our resolve to put our hope in Him who loves us. Even if this mother is at her weakest point, brought on by the decision of the Supreme Court, she boasts that He is strong in her.

With the answers to these questions, maybe the One Judge would look kindly on us who allow ourselves to be trapped by our humanity. Thank you.


EDITA T. BURGOS, ocds
Mother of Jonas Burgos

Friday, April 30, 2010

A Reflection Gathering: Human Rights Under Nine Years of the Arroyo Government

UNITY STATEMENT

We gathered at the Angelicum College in Quezon City on April 28, 2010
to reflect on the human rights situation in the country in the nine
years of the Arroyo Government. Our reflection was marked by the
stories of the kith and kin of victims of human rights violations and
how these violations have been brought about by the government’s
counter insurgency program through the Oplan Bantay Laya (OBL).

We shared the anguish of these relatives. We grieved over the
extra-judicial killings of more than a thousand people since 2001. We
were saddened by stories of torture and the enforced disappearance of
more than 200 people. We lamented the forcible evacuation and
displacement of thousands of people in the rural areas as a result of
military operations. We recalled with horror the massacre in
Maguindanao characterized among others by the fact that it had the
most number of journalists killed in a single incident. We expressed
alarm at the continuing detention of 43 health workers who were
illegally arrested in Morong, Rizal.

The human rights situation under the Arroyo Government is the worst
since that of the Martial Law years under Marcos. None in recent
years, can compare to the culture of impunity that characterized these
assaults on human dignity.

The statistics are no mere figures. They represent the scale and
magnitude of the gruesome impact of OBL. It is a counter-insurgency
program that has not made a distinction between armed combatants and
civilians propelled by the burning desire to serve and promote
significant changes for the better in the lives of people mired in
systemic poverty and neglect. The victims are farmers, workers,
community leaders, indigenous people, Muslims, activists, students,
health workers, churchworkers, lawyers, journalists, human rights
defenders and party-list organizers and volunteers. None in recent
memory can match the viciousness of the OBL and the human toll on
civilians whose only crime, if indeed it was a crime that warranted
their deaths and suffering, was principled dissent against government
and in favor of the welfare of the majority, the safeguarding of
posterity and patrimony of this country. The OBL is very much in
place. With the year 2010 as the deadline to beat. To meet the target
means more bloodbath.

To this day not a single perpetrator of these killings and violence to
human life has been convicted. It is a chilling indictment on a
government which claims adherence to democracy. It breeds righteous
indignation and fuels further discontent.

Our reflection bids us to hold high the struggle for the vindication
of the innocent and the punishment of those who willfully destroyed
life. Our reflection bids us demand of those in power that
perpetrators of extra-judicial killings, enforced disappearances and
other human rights violation be brought to the bars of justice. The
Arroyo Government must be held accountable for the repressive OBL and
the death, disappearance and abuse of innocent civilians in the name
of counter-insurgency.

We are people who believe in God’s redeeming love and call to be one
people under God’s sovereignty. There can be no more compelling reason
for us to bear witness and denounce this travesty, than the call to
live out and bear witness to our baptism that calls us to uphold the
sanctity of life. One killing is one too many. Oplan Bantay Laya is an
abomination – an instrument of violence, bloodshed and defiance of the
divine will of abundant life for all. It must be stopped.

Finally, we issue this challenge to those who will be victorious
following the May 10 elections: fulfill your promises; give justice to
the victims of human rights violations; end political repression;
discontinue the OBL as a policy and never embark on any similar
policy; and, address the roots of the insurgency namely, poverty and
injustice.

April 28, 2010